Strength Increases From the Motor Program: Comparison of Training With Maximal Voluntary and Imagined Muscle Contractions
Yue G, Cole KJ
Evidence is still limited and needs further study
Summary
Thirty healthy adults (n=10 per group) were randomized to actual maximal contraction training, imagined contraction training, or no training (control) of the fifth-digit abductor muscle for 4 weeks (5 sessions/week). The imagined-contraction group increased strength by about 22% (vs. ~30% for the actual-contraction group and 3.7% for controls), while electrically evoked twitch force was unchanged in all three groups — indicating no muscle hypertrophy occurred. The gains without hypertrophy suggest the strength increase from imagined training reflects central nervous system (motor program) adaptation rather than a muscular change. This is a single, small study (n=10/group) limited to one small muscle (the fifth-digit abductor).
Key findings
- 1
The imagined-contraction group increased fifth-digit abduction strength by ~22% (vs. ~30% for actual contraction and 3.7% for control)
- 2
Strength also increased in the untrained (contralateral) hand — 10% in the imagined group and 14% in the actual-contraction group, both significant vs. control (2.3%)
- 3
Electrically evoked twitch force (a hypertrophy marker) was unchanged in all three groups, suggesting the strength gain reflects central motor-program adaptation rather than muscle growth
- 4
Limitations: a small, single study (1992) with only 10 subjects per group, limited to one small muscle (fifth-digit abductor), over just 4 weeks
Related research
From Mental Power to Muscle Power—Gaining Strength by Using the Mind
Neuropsychologia, 2004
Healthy young adults were assigned to imagined training of finger abduction (n=8), imagined training of elbow flexion (n=8), a no-training control (n=8), or an actual physical-training group (n=6), performing 12 weeks (15 min/day, 5 days/week) of imagined maximal voluntary contraction. Imagined training alone increased finger-abduction strength by ~35% and elbow-flexion strength by ~13.5%, accompanied by rising EEG-derived cortical potentials that paralleled the strength gains. Gains did not match the physical-training group (~53%), and the control group showed no significant change. This is a small study (~8 per group) and cannot objectively verify how faithfully participants performed the mental contractions.
The Power of the Mind: The Cortex as a Critical Determinant of Muscle Strength/Weakness
Journal of Neurophysiology, 2014
In this RCT, 44 healthy young adults were randomized to 4 weeks of wrist-hand immobilization alone, immobilization plus daily mental imagery of strong contractions, or a no-intervention control. The immobilization-only group lost an average of 45% of wrist-flexor strength, while the immobilization-plus-imagery group lost only about 24% — roughly half as much. Measures of voluntary activation impairment and cortical inhibition were also smaller in the imagery group. The study population was healthy young adults; replication in real fracture/post-surgical patients or older adults, and direct measurement of muscle atrophy, were not part of this study.
Articles featuring this study
Last checked: